WHY DO MALE AUTHORS HAVE TO DESCRIBE PENISES IN SUCH DETAIL???
Why does the narrator have to compare said penis to his own???
Why did I just read, for the THIRD TIME THIS YEAR, a coroner observing things about the dead guys dick and thinking about how it compares to his own???
Why did I just read a murder victim’s penis and ‘taught, hairless scrotum’ explained in detail when it has zero things to do with him being dead. He drowned! I don’t need to know the shape/size/details of his junk when that has ZERO THINGS TO DO with him being dead!
Why is this something only male authors do???
WHY ARE MEN SO WEIRD???
Advertisements
Unfortunately, I think this is how men often think. Especially if the narrator is a man, I don’t necessarily think it would be odd for him to think to himself about comparisons. Why that would matter in terms of the narration, I don’t know. Men are strange. 😆
LikeLiked by 1 person